MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045663703 · doi:10.1109/ita.2008.4601015

Optimal causal quantization of Markov Sources with distortion constraints

2008· article· en· W2045663703 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandomnessEncoderMathematicsMarkov processQuantization (signal processing)Markov chainAsymptotically optimal algorithmMathematical optimizationRate–distortion theoryConvex optimizationAlgorithmRegular polygonData compressionStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For Markov sources, the structure of optimal causal encoders minimizing the total communication rate subject to a mean-square distortion constraint is studied. The class of sources considered lives in a continuous alphabet, and the encoder is allowed to be variable-rate. Both the finite-horizon and the infinite-horizon problems are considered. In the finite-horizon case, the problem is non-convex, whereas in the infinite-horizon case the problem can be convexified under certain assumptions. For a finite horizon problem, the optimal deterministic causal encoder for a kth-order Markov source uses only the most recent k source symbols and the information available at the receiver, whereas the optimal causal coder for a memoryless source is memoryless. For the infinite-horizon problem, a convex-analytic approach is adopted. Randomized stationary quantizers are suboptimal in the absence of common randomness between the encoder and the decoder. If there is common randomness, the optimal quantizer requires the randomization of at most two deterministic quantizers. In the absence of common randomness, the optimal quantizer is non-stationary and a recurrence-based time-sharing of two deterministic quantizers is optimal. A linear source driven by Gaussian noise is considered. If the process is stable, innovation coding is almost optimal at high-rates, whereas if the source is unstable, then even a high-rate time-invariant innovation coding scheme leads to an unstable estimation process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score0.246

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it