MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045680138 · doi:10.12927/hcq..17692

Making Canadian Healthcare Facilities 100% Smoke-Free: A National Trend Emerges

2005· article· en· W2045680138 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dan Parle, Shannon I.A. Parker, Dan Steeves

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Quarterly · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSmoking Behavior and Cessation
Canadian institutionsWaypoint Centre for Mental Health Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaHealth careSmokeBusinessPublic relationsEconomic growthPolitical scienceEngineeringGeographyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When the Calgary Health Region, the Mental Health Centre in Penetanguishene and Capital Health in Nova Scotia declared their sites 100% smoke-free (both buildings and grounds) in May of 2002 and May of 2003 respectively, the change was considered radical and foolish by some. Since then, the move to 100% smoke-free healthcare facilities has become a national trend in Canada, with many facilities following suit and many others planning to make the change. In this article, the authors reflect on what they have learned in these three jurisdictions and offer some advice for healthcare facilities preparing to implement smoke-free property policies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare QuarterlySame topicSmoking Behavior and CessationFrench-language works237,207