MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045715296 · doi:10.5539/mas.v4n8p33

Application of Differential Evolution for Congestion Management in Power System

2010· article· en· W2045715296 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sujatha Balaraman, N. Kamaraj

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Power System Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCongestion managementParticle swarm optimizationDifferential evolutionComputer scienceReliability (semiconductor)Electric power systemMathematical optimizationElectricity marketDatabase transactionElectricityDifferential (mechanical device)Work (physics)Order (exchange)Management systemOperations researchReliability engineeringPower (physics)AlgorithmOperations managementMathematicsBusinessEconomicsEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the emerging restructured power system, the congestion management (CM) has become extremely important in order to ensure the security and reliability of the system. This paper proposes an algorithm for congestion management in a pool based electricity market based on differential evolution (DE). The aim of the proposed work is to minimize deviations from preferred transaction schedules and hence the congestion cost. Numerical results on test system namely IEEE 30 Bus System is presented for illustration purpose and the results are compared with Particle swarm optimization (PSO) in terms of solution quality. The comprehensive experimental results prove that the DE is one among the challenging optimization methods which is indeed capable of obtaining higher quality solutions for the proposed problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicElectric Power System OptimizationFrench-language works237,207