MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045752148 · doi:10.1016/s1065-6995(03)00073-8

Possible origin of a membrane in the subsurface of the Earth

2003· review· en· W2045752148 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Biology International · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOrigins and Evolution of Life
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMembraneEarth (classical element)ChemistryAstrobiologyEnvironmental sciencePhysicsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A location for the origin of life on Earth could have been an oil/water interface in the warm, subsurface environment of the Earth. The physico-chemical conditions of the subsurface would include elevated, but eventually cooling temperatures, anaerobic conditions, and protection from intense surface radiation. This type of subsurface oil/water environment may have been ideal for the assembly of the first simple membrane(s), where no enzyme catalysis was needed. Once a stable, simple, continuous closed membrane was formed, one central component of the first cell(s) would have been present; a semi-permeable open system that allowed the passage of both matter and energy in and out of the cell. Such an open system could also acquire novel functions, whereas a closed system would be unable to evolve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.773

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it