Filmer les pratiques de soin dans la consultation médicale en acupuncture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans la consultation d’acupuncture, les aiguilles remplacent les médicaments du médecin allopathe. Ainsi, le traitement n’est pas différé, mais s’effectue plutôt sur-le-champ. Dans ces conditions, quelle est la place accordée au corps, à la parole du malade et à ses émotions dans la construction de « sa maladie » ? Quels en sont les impacts pour sa prise en charge thérapeutique ? Cette médecine propose-t-elle un autre modèle de mise en récit des maux et de la maladie ? Au-delà des résultats mêmes de l’étude, cet article tente d’évaluer l’impact du dispositif filmique comme mode de connaissance anthropologique ainsi que les possibilités heuristiques qu’offre le film pour une anthropologie des pratiques thérapeutiques en situation clinique. Nous essaierons ainsi d’aller plus loin dans ce domaine de l’anthropologie visuelle, encore peu exploré.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".