MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045760933 · doi:10.1109/icccas.2006.284615

Recent Advances in FIR Approximation by IIR Digital Filters

2006· article· en· W2045760933 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfinite impulse responseComputer scienceFinite impulse responseStability (learning theory)Digital filter2D FiltersFrequency domainDomain (mathematical analysis)Constraint (computer-aided design)AlgorithmMathematical optimizationFilter (signal processing)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper provides a tutorial review on several recent design methods for approximating FIR by IIR digital filters with reduced order. These methods can generally be classified as time-domain method, frequency-domain method, and mixed-domain method. The numerator and denominator of IIR digital filters are obtained in different steps under some criteria. The final result of each design method cannot be ensured to be optimal or even suboptimal for such approximation problem. Also, some methods do not incorporate a stability constraint hence stability is not really ensured. In this paper the design steps of each of these methods are outlined. Through three examples, we analyze their performances and identify the strengths and weaknesses of each design method

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207