The Association Between Acetaminophen Concentrations in the Cerebrospinal Fluid and Temperature Decline in Febrile Infants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study consisting of a prospective cohort of febrile infants was to describe the correlation between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) acetaminophen (paracetamol) concentrations and changes in body temperature in febrile infants. Infants, one week to one year of age, with rectal temperature >or=38.0 degrees C, treated with acetaminophen were studied if they underwent a lumbar puncture (LP). Patients received 15 mg/kg of acetaminophen 30 minutes to 4 hours before lumbar puncture was performed. Rectal temperature was documented before acetaminophen administration and at the time of lumbar puncture. Plasma and CSF acetaminophen levels were determined using high-pressure liquid chromatography. Thirty-one infants were studied. In a nonlinear regression, the relationship among acetaminophen concentrations in the CSF, time, and temperature differences is best described by a Lorentzian distribution. The model suggests that a peak effect on temperature is achieved at CSF concentration of 11.9 microg/mL and 182 minutes after acetaminophen administration (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively r=0.9 adjusted r square=0.78). Temperature decrement in young febrile infants, treated with acetaminophen, correlates with time and acetaminophen concentrations in the CSF. High concentrations of acetaminophen in the CSF, exceeding a certain level, are not associated with greater temperature decrement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".