MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2045782973 · doi:10.1139/f07-141

A statistical modeling method for estimating mortality and abundance of spawning salmon from a time series of counts

2008· article· en· W2045782973 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
R Glenn Szerlong, David E. Rundio

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCalifornia Department of Fish and Game
KeywordsAbundance (ecology)WeirStatisticsOncorhynchusMortality rateMaximum likelihoodMathematicsSeries (stratigraphy)BiologyEcologyFish <Actinopterygii>FisheryDemographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a statistical modeling method for estimating mortality and abundance of spawning salmon from time-series counts that eliminates the need for separate information about mortality. We model arrival and mortality using differential equations, where mortality can be constant or changing linearly, and estimate mortality and abundance from counts using maximum likelihood when multiple estimates of detection rate are available. We also develop an approximate likelihood to estimate mortality and abundance when only a single value for detection rate is available or to estimate only mortality when detection rates are entirely unknown. We demonstrate our approach using counts of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) where mortality, abundance, and detection were determined from tagging at a weir. Our model for nonconstant mortality produced mortality estimates that closely matched the empirical data and were robust to variation in other parameters. It also provided a better fit to the stream counts and a closer abundance estimate to the weir count than the constant mortality model. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that the approximate likelihood provided reasonable estimates of mortality over most of the ranges of parameters explored, particularly under the nonconstant mortality model, and produced relatively unbiased abundance estimates using a single value for detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→