Role of Ba<sup>2+</sup>-resistant K<sup>+</sup> channels in endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization of rat small mesenteric arteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In rat small mesenteric arteries, the influence of modulation of basal smooth muscle K+ efflux on the mechanism of endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization was investigated. The membrane potentials of the vascular smooth muscle cells were measured using conventional microelectrode techniques. Incubation of resting arteries with the gap junction uncoupler carbenoxolone (20 micro M) decreased the endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization elicited by a submaximal concentration of acetylcholine (3 micro M) to about 65% of the control. In the presence of Ba2+ (200 micro M), which depolarized the membrane potential by 10 mV, the acetylcholine-induced membrane potential response was doubled in magnitude, reaching values not different from control. Moreover, the hyperpolarization was more resistant to carbenoxolone in these conditions. Finally, both in the absence and in the presence of carbenoxolone, the combined application of Ba2+ and ouabain (0.5 mM) did not abolish the acetylcholine response. These results suggest that gap junctional coupling plays a role in endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization of smooth muscle cells of resting rat small mesenteric arteries. Additionally, these findings show that the hyperpolarization does not rely on activation of inward rectifying K+ channels. Although a minor contribution of Na-K pumping cannot be excluded, the Ba2+ experiments show that the membrane electrical response is mediated by activation of a Ba2+-resistant K+ conductance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".