The<i>Alloxysta</i>(Hymenoptera: Figitidae: Charipinae) type material in the United States National Museum of Natural History and the Canadian National Collection of Insects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract AlloxystaFörster, 1869 (Hymenoptera: Figitidae) type material of 19 nominal species deposited in the Canadian National Collection of Insects (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) and the United States National Museum of Natural History (Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America) were studied. Nine species are treated as valid:A. australiae(Ashmead, 1900),A. commensuratusAndrews, 1978,A. japonicus(Ashmead, 1904),A. lachni(Ashmead, 1885),A. longiventrisBaker, 1896,A. minusculaAndrews, 1978,A. nothofagiAndrews, 1976,A. vandenboschiAndrews, 1978, andA. xanthopsis(Ashmead, 1896). The following synonymies are established:A. affinis(Baker, 1896) andA. quebeciAndrews, 1978 junior synonyms ofA. castanea(Hartig, 1841);A. alaskensisAshmead, 1902 andA. coniferensisAndrews, 1978 junior synonyms ofA. macrophadna(Hartig, 1841);A. bicolor(Baker, 1896) andA. anthracinaAndrews, 1978 junior synonyms ofA. obscurata(Hartig, 1840);A. dicksoniAndrews, 1978 junior synonym ofA. pilipennis(Hartig, 1840); andA. leguminosa(Weld, 1920),A. megourae(Ashmead, 1887), andA. rauchiAndrews, 1978 junior synonyms ofA. brevis(Thomson, 1862). The type material ofA. schlingeriAndrews, 1978 andA. halliAndrews, 1978 could not be found and we consider them asnomina dubia. Alloxysta vandenboschiAndrews is removed from synonymy withA. obscurataand considered a valid species. Comments on the type material are given. Complete redescriptions and images are presented for the valid species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.042 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".