Le pastiche à l’épreuve du manuscrit Paris, BnF fr. 146 : le dépit amoureux de Fauvel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le cheval Fauvel, synthèse des Vices, s’est lancé dans une aventure insensée : demander la main de Fortune, qui le repousse brutalement et l’agonit de sarcasmes. La version du Roman de Fauvel contenue dans le manuscrit Bnf fr. 146 place à ce moment-clef du poème réécrit à partir de Gervais du Bus une longue interpolation de plus de 700 vers, qui amplifie le dépit amoureux du soupirant éconduit. Même si ce n’est pas, littéralement, l’âne à la lyre, la situation paraît idéale pour identifier les traces du pastiche, d’autant plus que la complainte est enrichie de citations lyriques et de pièces musicales insérées. L’enjeu est de repérer les indices textuels, iconographiques et autres, les marqueurs de l’imitation décalée. On constate, en cours d’analyse, que malgré l’évidence globale, le pointage précis se heurte à de nombreuses difficultés : entre le pastiche, la parodie et la satire, la ligne de partage est malaisée à tracer, et la part subjective de l’interprétation reste irréductible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".