MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045880387 · doi:10.1002/rnc.1390

Kalman filter‐based adaptive control for networked systems with unknown parameters and randomly missing outputs

2008· article· en· W2045880387 on OpenAlexafffund
Huazhen Fang, Maode Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsKalman filterEstimatorControl theory (sociology)Autoregressive modelComputer scienceBernoulli's principleConvergence (economics)Filter (signal processing)Process (computing)Control (management)MathematicsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper investigates the problem of adaptive control for networked control systems with unknown model parameters and randomly missing outputs. In particular, for a system with the autoregressive model with exogenous input placed in a network environment, the randomly missing output feature is modeled as a Bernoulli process. Then, an output estimator is designed to online estimate the missing output measurements, and further a Kalman filter‐based method is proposed for parameter estimation. Based on the estimated output and the available output, and the estimated model parameters, an adaptive control is designed to make the output track the desired signal. Convergence properties of the proposed algorithms are analyzed in detail. Simulation examples illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations109
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear ControlSame topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207