MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045883597 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450780411

Aqueous sulphur dioxide leaching of Cu, Ni, Co, Zn and Fe from smelter slag in absence of oxygen

2000· article· en· W2045883597 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Isaac B. Ahmed, Philip K. Gbor, Charles Q. Jia

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Extraction and Bioleaching
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissolutionLeaching (pedology)Slag (welding)SmeltingMetallurgyPrecipitationAqueous solutionFerrousChemistryPyrometallurgySulfurMaterials scienceSoil water

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Smelter slag and sulphur dioxide are waste products of non‐ferrous pyrometallurgical processes. Dissolution behaviour of Co, Cu, Fe, Ni and Zn from smelter slag in aqueous sulphur dioxide was studied. Experiments were carried out in batch mode, under near ambient conditions. Under the conditions studied, 81% Co, 60% Fe, 35% Ni and 68% Zn extraction were achieved within 3 h, while Cu behaved very differently. The initial dissolution of Cu was rapid, but subsequent precipitation lowered its overall extraction. The precipitation of Cu was more temperature sensitive than its dissolution. At 65°C all the dissolved Cu was precipitated in 2.5 h. The successive precipitation was explained based on the solution chemistry of the Cu‐Fe‐S(IV) system. Dissolution kinetics of the other metals were evaluated using the shrinking core model. Diffusion through the product/ash layer appeared to be the rate controlling step. SEM‐EDS analysis was used to characterize the slag and to confirm the existence of a product/ash layer after leaching.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicMetal Extraction and BioleachingFrench-language works237,207