MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045914331 · doi:10.3138/jrpc.26.2.202

“There’s a New World Coming”: The Eschatology of Bruce Springsteen’s <i>Wrecking Ball</i>

2014· article· en· W2045914331 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Spencer L. Allen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Religion and Popular Culture · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPentecostalism and Christianity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeavenEschatologyHumanityPrayerParallelsKingdomArtPhilosophyLiteratureArt historyHistoryTheologyEngineeringBiologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The economic realities facing the characters on Bruce Springsteen’s Wrecking Ball (2012) are so dire that many would rather anticipate a new world order in which society is transformed through humanity’s efforts than continue living in the world as it is. Avoiding apocalyptic language, the new world presented in “Jack of All Trades,” “Rocky Ground,” and other songs closely resembles the eschatological wish famously described in the Pater Noster, or the Lord’s Prayer. This article explores the present-day fears and the future-oriented optimisms underlying these eschatological wishes, including when Springsteen’s vision parallels and departs from Jesus’s Kingdom of Heaven.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Religion and Popular CultureSame topicPentecostalism and Christianity StudiesFrench-language works237,207