MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045926009 · doi:10.1190/1.2435171

Correlation between near-surface electromagnetic soil parameters and early-time GPR signals: An experimental study

2007· article· en· W2045926009 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsStemSoft Software (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGround-penetrating radarReflectometrySubsoilTime domainRadarAmplitudeGeologyEnvelope (radar)PermittivitySoil scienceAcousticsRemote sensingGeophysicsMaterials scienceComputer sciencePhysicsSoil waterOpticsTelecommunicationsDielectric

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We explore a new approach to evaluate the effect of soil electromagnetic parameters on early-time ground-penetrating radar (GPR) signals. The analysis is performed in a time interval which contains the direct airwaves and ground waves, propagating between transmitting and receiving antennas. To perform the measurements we have selected a natural test site characterized by very strong lateral gradient of the soil electrical properties. To evaluate the effect of the subsoil permittivity and conductivity on the radar response we compare the envelope amplitude of the GPR signals received in the first 12ns within 4ns-wide windows, with the electrical properties (εr and σDC) determined using time-domain reflectometry (TDR). The results show that the constitutive soil parameters strongly influence early-time signals, suggesting a novel approach for estimating the spatial variability of water content with GPR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.762

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it