MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045933272 · doi:10.5539/ijms.v2n1p65

Consumers’ Perceptions, Attitudes and Willingness to Pay towards Food Products with “No Added Msg” Labeling

2010· article· en· W2045933272 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alias Radam, Mohd Rusli Yacob, Than Siew Bee, Jinap Selamat

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Marketing Studies · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWillingness to payConsumption (sociology)Monosodium glutamateBusinessContingent valuationPerceptionSAFERLogitMarketingOrder (exchange)Food safetyValuation (finance)Agricultural scienceEconomicsFood sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research was carried out in order to determine consumers’ perceptions, attitudes and willingness-to-pay(WTP) towards food products with “No Added MSG” labeling. A total of 200 respondents within the area ofKlang Valley were interviewed using a close-ended questionnaire. The Contingent Valuation Method (CVM)was used to determine the consumers’ WTP for the consumption of safer beef. A logit model was used toestimate the premium that consumers are willing to pay for food products with “No Added MSG” labeling. Theresults pointed out that majority of the consumers know and have read about or heard of Monosodium Glutamate(MSG) and illnesses caused by MSG, but only a small portion of them have experienced these illnesses before.Not all of the consumers have high awareness towards illnesses caused by MSG due to lack of information.However, their perceptions and attitudes towards food products with “No added MSG” labeling were found to begenerally positive. Besides, the CV method which was used to determine and estimate consumers’ WTP towardsthe food products mentioned by using logit model showed that the most important and significant actors thatinfluenced a consumers’ WTP are gender (female), household size, household income, family member withchildren below the age of 12, price levels and education level (university). Results also revealed that respondentswere willing to pay a premium of about RM 0.43 for food products with “No added MSG” labeling. Based onthe study, it was found that the demand and consumption of “No Added MSG” is still high and increasing. Thiscurrent trend will certainly have effects on the present market. Hence, to ensure a better development of theseproducts, there is a need to formulate proper standards, policies and promotion programmes for these productsmore efforts in research and development (R&D) are needed to improve the production technologies and foodsafety systems for these “No Added MSG” food products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Marketing StudiesSame topicConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingFrench-language works237,207