MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W204600454

Steiner tree and interconnect optimization in VLSI design.

2002· article· en· W204600454 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jiang Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSteiner tree problemVery-large-scale integrationInterconnectionComputer sciencePhysical designMathematical optimizationCircuit designMathematicsEmbedded systemTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the key problems in VLSI interconnect design is the topology construction of signal nets with minimum cost. Steiner tree problem is to find the tree structure that connects all pins of a signal net such that the wire length can be minimized. Since Steiner tree problem is NP-hard, many different heuristics and approximation algorithms have been derived to deal with this problem. However, in VLSI design automation the routing is performed in the presence of obstacles, such as logic cells, where the wires of the net must not intersect. Most of the previous heuristics deal with problems under the assumption that wires do not cross any obstacles. In this study, a class of probabilistic approaches to Steiner tree problem has been extensively explored, which is able to construct Steiner tree with good performance in term of wire length or speed, and able to solve the problem in presence of obstacles. Probabilistic model and a series of algorithms based on it have been established and implemented. Extensive experiments conducted on both small- and large-size problems have been designed to show the performance comparison with the state-of-the-art algorithm. How to deal with blockage and congestion in probabilistic algorithms has been discussed. Also, an optimization algorithm has also been presented, which improves wire length from the results of probabilistic algorithms as well as any other algorithms. In addition, the potential advantages with our approaches are also discussed for further applications.Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Paper copy at Leddy Library: Theses & Major Papers - Basement, West Bldg. / Call Number: Thesis2002 .Z44. Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 41-04, page: 1162. Adviser: Chunhong Chen. Thesis (M.A.Sc.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 2002.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.512
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)Same topicVLSI and FPGA Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207