Middle Palaeogene dinoflagellate cysts from Tierra del Fuego, Argentina: biostratigraphy and palaeoenvironments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Palynological data from four surface sections in northern Tierra del Fuego, southern Argentina, provide a biostratigraphical and palaeoenvironmental framework for the lower member of the La Despedida Formation and the Cabo Peña Formation in their type areas. Selected dinoflagellate cyst (dinocyst) events indicate that the age of the lower member of the La Despedida Formation is Middle Eocene and that of the Cabo Peña Formation is Late Eocene–earliest Oligocene. The age assigned to the La Despedida Formation agrees with determinations based on calcareous microfossils, but there is a potential discrepancy regarding the Cabo Peña Formation. According to recent stratigraphic studies, the Cabo Domingo Group, which includes the Cabo Peña Formation, is Late Eocene–Miocene in age. The palynomorph assemblages from the lower member of the La Despedida Formation contain the endemic ‘Transantarctic Flora’, which reflects marginal marine conditions. The maximum abundance of Enneadocysta spp. reflects more open-sea conditions and a warming event during the late Middle Eocene. The lower part of the Cabo Peña Formation has a high ratio of dinocysts to sporomorphs and an abundance of Nematosphaeropsis lemniscata, Reticulatosphaera actinocoronata and Impagidinium spp., suggesting an oceanic to outer neritic environment. Abundant Gelatia inflata and protoperidiniacean cysts indicate cool surface waters rich in dissolved nutrients. These cold-water markers may reflect the development of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current, an important event in the transition from a greenhouse to an icehouse climate mode. Toward the top of the sections, the lower ratios of dinocysts to sporomorphs, as well as the composition of the dinocyst assemblages, reflect a neritic rather than an oceanic setting. This palynological change may be due to eustatic sea-level lowering caused by cooling during the latest Eocene–earliest Oligocene. A new species, Spiniferites scalenus, is described and the new combination Lingulodinium echinatum proposed; an emendation for the latter species is also proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".