MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046015084 · doi:10.1080/10584580008222277

Glycolate tantalum based solutions for the sol-gel spin-coating deposition of SrBi<sub>2</sub>Ta<sub>2</sub>O<sub>9</sub>thin films

2000· article· en· W2046015084 on OpenAlexfundno aff
A. González, Ricardo Jiménez, J. Mendiola, M. L. Calzada

Bibliographic record

VenueIntegrated ferroelectrics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSimon Fraser University
KeywordsMaterials scienceTantalateCoercivityTantalumPerovskite (structure)CrystallizationThin filmPhase (matter)Spin coatingChemical engineeringAlkoxideAnalytical Chemistry (journal)FerroelectricityDielectricNanotechnologyMetallurgyOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reaction of tantalum ethoxide with a glycol solvent produces the interchange of the ethoxide groups with the glycol. As a result, a polymeric derivative is formed with a high resistance towards hydrolysis. Compounds of Sr(II) and Bi(II) can be added to this Ta-glycol sol, leading to strontium bismuth tantalate (SBT) precursor solutions stable in air. These solutions were spin-coated onto two substrates: Pt/TiO2/SiO2/(100)Si and Ti/Pt/Ti/SiO2/(100)Si. Crystallisation of the SBT phase was carried out by a first formation of a fluorite phase that evolves to the layered perovskite at temperatures over 600°C. During crystallisation, a larger tendency to the formation of a substrate/film interface was observed in the films deposited onto Ti/Pt/Ti/SiO2/(100)Si than onto Pt/TiO2/SiO2/(100)Si. A remanent polarisation of Pr5 μC/cm2 and a coercive field of Ec <100 kV/cm were measured in the films on Pt/TiO2/SiO2/(100)Si. These films retain its remanent polarisation, Pr, up to 105seconds and are fatigue-free up to 109 cycles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntegrated ferroelectricsSame topicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsFrench-language works237,207