MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046015248 · doi:10.1021/jp994096z

Properties of Atoms in Molecules:  Atoms Forming Molecules

2000· article· en· W2046015248 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirial theoremAtoms in moleculesChemistryAtomic physicsKinetic energyElectron densityElectronPolarRange (aeronautics)MoleculePotential energyChemical polarityChemical physicsMolecular physicsPhysicsMaterials scienceClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the evolution of the electron densities of two separated atoms into an equilibrium molecular distribution. A range of interactions is considered: from closed-shell with and without charge transfer, through polar-shared, to equally shared interactions. The changes in the density are monitored in terms of the properties of the density at the bond critical point and the shape of the interatomic surface. The effect of these changes on the properties of the atoms defined as proper open systems is determined. The “harpoon mechanism” operative in the formation of LiF is found to exert dramatic effects on the electron density and on the atomic and molecular properties. The virial and the Ehrenfest force theorems in their molecular, atomic, and local forms, together with the Hellmann−Feynman theorem, provide an understanding of the similarities and differences in the bonding resulting from closed-shell, shared, and polar interactions. The effect of the long-range dispersion forces on the electron density and the resulting changes in the kinetic and potential energies, the former decreasing and the latter increasing on the initial approach of the atoms, are investigated. In addition to the changes in the total energy and its kinetic and potential energy components as a function of the internuclear separation R, the atomic contributions to these quantities are also reported. The atomic Ehrenfest force is the force acting on the electron density in an atomic basin and the one measured in an atomic force microscope. It is shown to change from an intially attractive interaction, to a repulsive one at a separation slightly greater than R e where the Hellmann−Feynman forces on the nuclei vanish.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it