Properties of Atoms in Molecules: Atoms Forming Molecules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies the evolution of the electron densities of two separated atoms into an equilibrium molecular distribution. A range of interactions is considered: from closed-shell with and without charge transfer, through polar-shared, to equally shared interactions. The changes in the density are monitored in terms of the properties of the density at the bond critical point and the shape of the interatomic surface. The effect of these changes on the properties of the atoms defined as proper open systems is determined. The “harpoon mechanism” operative in the formation of LiF is found to exert dramatic effects on the electron density and on the atomic and molecular properties. The virial and the Ehrenfest force theorems in their molecular, atomic, and local forms, together with the Hellmann−Feynman theorem, provide an understanding of the similarities and differences in the bonding resulting from closed-shell, shared, and polar interactions. The effect of the long-range dispersion forces on the electron density and the resulting changes in the kinetic and potential energies, the former decreasing and the latter increasing on the initial approach of the atoms, are investigated. In addition to the changes in the total energy and its kinetic and potential energy components as a function of the internuclear separation R, the atomic contributions to these quantities are also reported. The atomic Ehrenfest force is the force acting on the electron density in an atomic basin and the one measured in an atomic force microscope. It is shown to change from an intially attractive interaction, to a repulsive one at a separation slightly greater than R e where the Hellmann−Feynman forces on the nuclei vanish.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".