MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046028912 · doi:10.1063/1.1545775

Negative ion photoelectron spectra simulation of V3O from a density functional study

2003· article· en· W2046028912 on OpenAlexaff
Patrizia Calaminici, Andreas M. Köster, Dennis R. Salahub

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsGround stateExcited stateAtomic physicsChemistryIonSpectral lineDensity functional theoryAtom (system on chip)Adiabatic processElectron affinity (data page)Basis setX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyMolecular physicsComputational chemistryMoleculePhysicsNuclear magnetic resonance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A density functional study of neutral and anionic vanadium trimer monoxides is presented. The calculations were of all-electron type employing a newly developed basis set for the vanadium atom. Different isomers of V3O and V3O− were studied in order to determine the ground state structures. For both systems a planar C2v structure with an edge-bonded oxygen atom was found as the ground state. Equilibrium structure parameters of ground states as well as low-lying excited states, harmonic frequencies, the adiabatic electron affinity, and Kohn–Sham orbital diagrams are reported. The experimental negative ion photoelectron spectra of V3O was simulated by calculating multidimensional Franck–Condon factors, using the geometries and harmonic frequencies of the calculated ground states of V3O− and V3O. The good agreement between the experimental and the theoretical spectra allows the determination of the ground state structure of V3O and V3O−. This represents the first work in which a simulation of a vibrationally resolved negative ion photoelectron spectra of a transition metal oxide is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.340
Threshold uncertainty score0.481

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207