MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046042736 · doi:10.14195/2176-6436_22-1_1

Plaisir et amitié: Homère et Aristote en dialogue

2009· article· fr· W2046042736 on OpenAlexaff
Catherine Collobert

Bibliographic record

VenueClassica - Revista Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPsychology of Social Influence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’affection et la compassion ont en commun d’être des emotions sociales, mais si la première est accompagnée de plaisir, la seconde est accompagnée de peine, selon Aristote. Il est cependant possible, selon Homère à la différence d’Aristote, d’éprouver de la compassion pour l’ami. Nous interrogeons ici le lien entre compassion et affection et montrons qu’en tant qu’émotions, elles sont constituées d’un désir d’agir en vue du bien de l’autre, c’est-à-dire d’un désir altruiste chez Homère. La satisfaction de ce désir produit un plaisir double qui prend la forme du contentement et de l’apaisement. Nous illustrons notre propos en établissant un dialogue entre Homère et Aristote.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClassica - Revista Brasileira de Estudos ClássicosSame topicPsychology of Social InfluenceFrench-language works237,207