Continental tholeiitic mafic rocks of the Paleoproterozoic Hurwitz Group, Central Hearne sub-domain, Nunavut: insight into the evolution of the Hearne sub-continental lithosphere
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Paleoproterozoic Hurwitz Group of the western Churchill Province is an erosional remnant of an areally extensive, predominantly shallow-water intracratonic basin comprised of four major sequences. Sequence 2, forming the central part of the stratigraphy, contains the Ameto Formation, a sequence of pillowed and massive basaltic rocks and associated gabbro sills termed the Happotiyik Member that are interlayered with subordinate deep-water mudstones, siltstones, and diamictites. Whole-rock geochemical data for the mafic rocks reveals a suite of homogeneous tholeiitic basalts with affinities to both continental and volcanic-arc tholeiites. Compatible trace elements and large-ion lithophile elements exhibit scattered behavior, whereas all high field strength elements show a systematic increase with Zr. The rocks are large-ion lithophile and light rare-earth element enriched, and have parallel primitive mantle normalized extended trace element patterns with prominent negative Nb, Ta, and Ti anomalies. εNd(t=2200 Ma) values for the rocks range from 0.0 to +0.8. The data indicate that the parental magmas were derived from a heterogeneous, predominantly depleted mantle source that included a minor metasomatically enriched component. Contamination by Neoarchean, juvenile silicic upper crust during ascent was minimal. We envisage that the rocks of the Happotiyik Member were generated from sub-continental lithospheric mantle that was stabilized immediately after formation of the ca. 2680 Ma, Neoarchean Central Hearne sub-domain. This enrichment occurred via metasomatic infiltration of subduction-derived fluids and melts into the overlying lithosphere. A wide range of Paleoproterozoic intra-continental mafic rocks in the western Churchill Province exhibit comparable geochemical and isotopic signatures that suggest an origin in the lithospheric mantle. These observations imply that the Hearne sub-continental lithospheric mantle has endured since the Neoarchean and likely persists today.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".