MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046073442 · doi:10.1139/x99-244

Physical properties of water in relation to stemflow leachate dynamics: implications for nutrient cycling

2000· article· en· W2046073442 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Delphis F. Levia, Stanley R. Herwitz

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStemflowEnvironmental scienceBasal areaPrecipitationForest floorCrown (dentistry)Hydrology (agriculture)Atmospheric sciencesSoil scienceEcologyThroughfallSoil waterGeologyMeteorologyMaterials scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stemflow leachate chemistry from a deciduous canopy tree species monitored during late winter and early spring precipitation events demonstrated significant chemical enrichment. By considering stemflow volume and chemical concentration in relation to the quantity that would be expected in a rain gage occupying an area equivalent to the trunk basal area, manganese was found to be enriched by a mean factor of 1450 and potassium by a mean factor of 580. The most pronounced enrichment was documented during a late winter rain-on-snow event characterized by temperature oscillations near the freezing point. During this event, manganese was enriched by a factor of 4400 and potassium by 1715. We conclude that mixed precipitation events with multiple freeze-melt cycles can generate significantly more leachate than spring rainfall events because of lower air temperatures and increased kinematic viscosity and surface tension of stemflow drainage. These physical properties lengthen the residence time of intercepted precipitation on the woody frame of the tree and promote its funneling from inclined branches. Stemflow represents a spatially localized and enriched point input that may affect tree vigor in early spring. The influence of localized aqueous chemical fluxes to the forest floor on forest biogeochemistry and ecophysiological functioning are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations109
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsFrench-language works237,207