MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046094923 · doi:10.1177/002218560004200207

How Does Canadian Labour Law Fare in a Global Economy?

2000· article· en· W2046094923 on OpenAlexaffabout
Pierre Verge

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Industrial Relations · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLabor Movements and Unions
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationLabour lawGlobalizationContext (archaeology)Political scienceLawEconomicsEconomyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the evolution of both the domestic and international dimen sions of Canadian labour law in the contemporary context of globalisation. The analysis of the origins and basic features of the domestic system, as illustrated by prevailing legislation in the federal and Quebec jurisdictions, highlights the overall stability of the 'Canadian model', with respect to both the legal framework of collective labour relations and employment standards. The possibility of globalising labour law through tbe insertion of international dimensions is also explored. An analysis of the North American Agreement on Labour Cooperation and other sources of inter national law relevant to tbe Canadian scene points to considerable deficiencies in the legal system's handling of transnational labour relations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Industrial RelationsSame topicLabor Movements and UnionsFrench-language works237,207