Non-Atherosclerotic Fusiform Cerebral Aneurysms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fusiform cerebral aneurysms are dilatations of the entire circumference of a segment of cerebral artery, usually considered due to atherosclerosis in adults. They are relatively thick-walled and elongated, causing neural compression or ischemia when discovered. We have noted a subset of fusiform cerebral aneurysms that vary from this common description. PATIENTS: Out of a series of 472 intracranial aneurysms treated over 11 years, 11 patients between the ages 16 and 67 years (mean age 37) were identified who had discrete fusiform aneurysms unassociated with generalized cerebral atherosclerosis, connective tissue disorder or inflammation. Three presented with hemorrhage, six with neural compression by the aneurysm and two were discovered incidentally. RESULTS: Nine aneurysms were located in the posterior circulation, the other two in the intracranial carotid artery. Their mean length and width were 16.3 and 11 mm, respectively. Three aneurysms contained thrombus. The eight aneurysms that were exposed surgically were partly or substantially thin-walled with normal appearing parent arteries. Eight were treated with proximal occlusion and three were circumferentially "wrapped". Parent artery occlusion caused one death and one mild disability and the remaining patients made good recoveries (follow-up 0.5 - 10 years). CONCLUSIONS: There is a subset of cerebral aneurysms with discrete fusiform morphology, apparently unrelated to cerebral atherosclerosis or systemic connective tissue disease, thin-walled in part or whole, more common in the vertebrobasilar system, and possessing a risk of rupture. Treatments currently available include proximal occlusion or aneurysm wrapping", different approaches than neck-clipping or endovascular coiling of side-wall saccular cerebral aneurysms that leave the parent artery intact.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".