MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046167706 · doi:10.1089/15305620260507549

Teleconsultation Practice Guidelines: Report from G8 Global Health Applications Subproject 4

2002· article· en· W2046167706 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Nerlich, E. Andrew Balas, Thomas J. Schall, Seán-Patrick Stieglitz, Ruth Filzmaier, Patrick Asbach, Christian Dierks, André Lacroix, Mamoru Watanabe, Jay H. Sanders, Charles R. Doarn, Ronald C. Merrell

Bibliographic record

VenueTelemedicine Journal and e-Health · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuidelineTelemedicineClinical PracticeHealth careMedicineGlobal healthFamily medicinePolitical sciencePathologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report presents a series of recommendations derived from deliberations of the G8 countries Subproject 4 Group (SP4 Group) of the Global Health Care Applications Project entitled, A Teleconsultation Practice Guideline. The recommendations provide an initial step toward developing a general guideline platform for the practice of telemedicine/teleconsultation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.059
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.083
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0590.083
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0080.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTelemedicine Journal and e-HealthSame topicTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationFrench-language works237,207