MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046189652 · doi:10.7202/1008310ar

La judiciarisation des relations intergouvernementales au Mexique depuis 19941

2012· article· fr· W2046189652 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vicente Ugalde

Bibliographic record

VenuePolitique et Sociétés · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJudicial and Constitutional Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marquée par la défaite électorale du Parti révolutionnaire institutionnel (PRI) en 2000, la transition du régime politique au Mexique a favorisé la diversification de la géographie politico-électorale. Cette pluralité politique a, entre autres conséquences, mis en évidence de nombreux conflits intergouvernementaux jusqu’alors dissimulés par l’hégémonie du PRI. Dans ce contexte, cet article propose une révision de la procédure de contrôle constitutionnel ( controversia constitucional ), réformée en 1994, pour dresser un état des lieux de l’intervention croissante de la Cour suprême dans la résolution des conflits entre les unités et les niveaux de gouvernement. Plus concrètement, l’objectif est de repérer les procédures engagées par les municipalités et d’identifier les domaines concernés ainsi que les tendances dans les résolutions concernant les compétences des municipalités. Cette révision permettra d’identifier les domaines d’intervention des municipalités et les moyens d’action (lois, règlements, décrets, budgets) pour lesquels les relations intergouvernementales sont plus ou moins controversées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolitique et SociétésSame topicJudicial and Constitutional StudiesFrench-language works237,207