MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046211096 · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2012.6213931

Improved ICI estimation for mobile OFDM systems

2012· article· en· W2046211096 on OpenAlexaff
Zhihong Hong, Liang Zhang, Louis Thibault

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubcarrierOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingComputer scienceMultipath propagationChannel (broadcasting)FadingInterference (communication)Multiplicative functionElectronic engineeringAlgorithmTelecommunicationsMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To combat Inter-Carrier Interference (ICI) in mobile OFDM systems, ICI can be reconstructed and removed from the received signal with the aid of channel estimation and decision-feedback. Successful ICI cancellation hinges on accurate channel estimation, which includes both the channel gains and ICI gains, the multiplicative coefficients to the neighbor subcarrier signals representing their power leakage. The channel estimation methods based on the statistical property of the ICI gains were previously proposed by the authors. In this paper, we propose improved ICI gain estimation scheme exploiting the sparse property of the multipath fading channels. The scaling relationship between ICI gain vectors is also further exploited to significantly improve the performance of ICI gain estimation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207