MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046215832 · doi:10.1142/s0217732308026443

A FIELD THEORY MODEL WITH A NEW LORENTZ-INVARIANT ENERGY SCALE

2008· article· en· W2046215832 on OpenAlex
Tomasz Konopka

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Physics Letters A · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsTheoretical physicsLorentz covarianceScalar fieldDoubly special relativityQuantum gravityClassical mechanicsEffective field theoryFour-momentumCPT symmetryScale invarianceUnitary stateQuantum field theoryTheory of relativityLorentz transformationQuantumMathematical physicsFour-forceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A framework is proposed for field theory with a new energy scale. The proposal is based on the idea, appearing for example in Deformed Special Relativity (DSR), of building phenomenological models for quantum gravity by taking momentum space to be curved rather than flat. In this work, this idea is implemented by introducing a fifth dimension and by imposing an extra constraint on physical field configurations in addition to the mass shell constraint. Advantages of this approach are that Lorentz symmetry is explicitly preserved and that an interacting scalar field model constructed in this way can be shown to be unitary. Implications for electrodynamics are discussed but the interpretation of the extra dimension needs to be clarified before making predictions for experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.841

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it