MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046224959 · doi:10.1116/1.2198858

Modeling the suppression of boron diffusion in Si∕SiGe due to carbon incorporation

2006· article· en· W2046224959 on OpenAlexaff
Samer Rizk, Yaser M. Haddara, A. Sibaja-Hernandez

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing Measurement and Phenomena · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoronSiliconCarbon fibersMaterials scienceDiffusionOxidizing agentInert gasGermaniumInertAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OptoelectronicsThermodynamicsChemistryComposite materialNuclear physicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We used the process simulator FLOOPS-ISE to implement a consistent model describing the diffusion behaviors of boron and carbon in silicon and silicon germanium. In particular, our model successfully accounts for boron and carbon behaviors in a wide range of sample structures and experimental conditions over the complete temperature range of 750–1070°C in inert and oxidizing ambients, and in the presence of implant damage. The structures studied include cases where the boron and carbon profiles are separated as well as cases where profiles overlap, cases with carbon in silicon and in SiGe, and our own recent experiments where boron diffusion within a SiGeC region has been characterized. We model carbon diffusion by the kickout and Frank-Turnbull mechanisms, and interstitial capture by substitutional carbon, and demonstrate that a model must incorporate all three effects to satisfactorily explain published data. We also include standard models for boron-interstitial clusters and {311} defects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing Measurement and PhenomenaSame topicSilicon and Solar Cell TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207