MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046257140 · doi:10.1177/082957350001500203

Pædiatric HIV/AIDS: School Implications

2000· article· en· W2046257140 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jillian Roberts

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of School Psychology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Life expectancyPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyFamily medicineMedicineEnvironmental healthPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent advances in HIV/AIDS treatments are extending the life expectancy of many infected children, allowing them to survive well into their school age years. However the mixing of pædiatric HIV/AIDS and school systems has not been an easy one. This article discusses the primary ethical dilemmas involved when children with HIV/AIDS attend school: a) the right to admittance and b) the right to privacy. A review of the American and Canadian ethical and legal findings surrounding these two contentious issues is offered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.008
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of School PsychologySame topicEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric HealthcareFrench-language works237,207