The <i>W</i> algorithm and the <i>D</i> transformation for the numerical evaluation of three‐center nuclear attraction integrals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Three‐center nuclear attraction integrals over exponential‐type functions are required for ab initio molecular structure calculations and density functional theory (DFT). These integrals occur in many millions of terms, even for small molecules, and they require rapid and accurate numerical evaluation. The use of a basis set of B functions to represent atomic orbitals, combined with the Fourier transform method, led to the development of analytic expressions for these molecular integrals. Unfortunately, the numerical evaluation of the analytic expressions obtained turned out to be extremely difficult due to the presence of two‐dimensional integral representations, involving spherical Bessel integral functions. % The present work concerns the development of an extremely accurate and rapid algorithm for the numerical evaluation of these spherical Bessel integrals. This algorithm, which is based on the nonlinear D transformation and the W algorithm of Sidi, can be computed recursively, allowing the control of the degree of accuracy. Numerical analysis tests were performed to further improve the efficiency of our algorithm. The numerical results section demonstrates the efficiency of this new algorithm for the numerical evaluation of three‐center nuclear attraction integrals. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2007
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it