Artificial neural network application for the prediction of ground surface movements induced by shield tunnelling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a methodology to correlate ground surface movements and tunnel boring machine (TBM) operation parameters. Two approaches are proposed and evaluated based on a case study of a shallow tunnel in a dense urban area. The first approach is based on a least square approximation and the second one uses an artificial neural network model. Data analysed were selected from the excavation of the subway line B tunnel in Toulouse, France, which was performed mainly by a shield TBM. Ground movements measured on the 4.7 km long contract 2 are reproduced with reasonable agreement by each of the two approaches. The amount of data (in particular for TBM operation parameters), the rather small amplitude of measured movements (a few millimetres), and the accuracy of these measurements (designed for routine construction management) make it necessary to create a pre-processing technique for the data, and a step-by-step improvement of approaches used. An elimination procedure is proposed to identify the most influential operation parameters and a sensitivity analysis shows their respective effect on ground movements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it