MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046304520 · doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.515621

Audiometric thresholds measured with single and dual BAHA transducers: The effect of phase inversion

2010· article· en· W2046304520 on OpenAlexaff
Ross W. Deas, Robert B. A. Adamson, Laura L. Curran, Fawaz Makki, Manohar Bance, Jeremy A. Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Audiology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcousticsVibrationAudiologyOffset (computer science)Phase (matter)Phase differenceHearing aidAbsolute threshold of hearingPhysicsComputer scienceHearing lossMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The bone-anchored-hearing-aid (BAHA) transduces airborne sound into skull vibration. Current bilateral BAHA configurations, for sounds directly facing listeners, will apply forces that are in-phase with each other and directed roughly towards the center of the head. Below approximately 1000 Hz the two cochleae respond in approximately the same direction and with approximately the same phase to each BAHA, thus it may be preferable to drive bilateral BAHAs such that when one pushes, the other pulls. This can be achieved by adjusting the relative phase offset of the BAHAs, and doing so results in greater vibration and improved hearing threshold. In this paper we compare performance of bilateral BAHAs driven in this configuration to the standard configuration. In twelve normal participants we show significant improvements in low-frequency (≤750 Hz) hearing thresholds using out-of-phase BAHAs. The threshold measurements are further supported by velocimetric measurements taken at the cochlear promontory in a cadaveric head. Comparing vibration arising from each configuration confirms that out-of-phase driving results in greater vibration. Neither dataset shows either improved or reduced threshold at high frequencies.SumarioLos auxiliares auditivos osteo-integrados (BAHA), convierten el sonido del aire, en vibración en el cráneo. Las configuraciones bilaterales actuales del BAHA, para sonidos que están directamente frente a los oyentes, aplican fuerzas que están en fase entre si y dirigidas alrededor del centro de la cabeza. Aproximadamente por debajo de 1000 Hz, las cócleas responden aproximadamente en la misma dirección y la misma fase en cada BAHA, por lo que es preferible el manejo de BAHAs bilaterales para que cuando uno empuja, el otro arrastre. Esto puede lograrse ajustando los controles de fase relativa de los BAHAs, que así resultan en mayor vibración y mejoría de umbrales auditivos. En este trabajo comparamos el desempeño de BAHAs bilaterales con esta configuración frente a la configuración estándar. En doce participantes normales mostramos mejorías significativas en umbrales auditivos de frecuencia baja (≤750 Hz) usando BAHAS fuera de fase. Las mediciones de umbrales son además apoyadas por mediciones velocimétricas tomadas en el promontorio coclear de la cabeza de un cadáver. Al comparar la vibración que surge de cada configuración, se confirma que los resultados obtenidos fuera de fase, resultan en una mayor vibración. Ninguno de los datos muestra mejoría o reducción de umbrales en las frecuencias agudas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of AudiologySame topicHearing Loss and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207