THE PERALKALINE TIN-MINERALIZED MADEIRA CRYOLITE ALBITE-RICH GRANITE OF PITINGA, AMAZONIAN CRATON, BRAZIL: PETROGRAPHY, MINERALOGY AND CRYSTALLIZATION PROCESSES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 1.818 Ga magmatic, subsolvus, Madeira albite-rich granite of the Pitinga province, exploited at the Pitinga mine, in northern Brazil, crystallized from a F-rich melt, also enriched in Sn, Rb, and HFSE. It is composed of a peralkaline, cryolite-bearing core facies and a peraluminous to metaluminous, oxidized, fluorite-bearing border facies, generated by autometasomatic processes after the crystallization of the core facies. A metaluminous to peralkaline hypersolvus granite is comagmatic with the albite-rich granite. Petrographic studies indicate that quartz was the first phase to crystallize, at ~700°C; the quartz – K-feldspar cotectic was attained at around 650°C, and the ternary feldspar solvus and onset of albite crystallization, down to the solidus, estimated at around 500°C. Massive cryolite and pegmatitic rocks found in the center of the stock were derived from the residual melt. The albite-rich granite probably originated by crystallization of a dense, F-rich, peralkaline phase derived from a peralkaline to metaluminous parental melt by immiscibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".