MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046328445 · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/33/1/012005

Modeling and Optimizing Ti-6Al-4V Ingot Production

2012· article· en· W2046328445 on OpenAlexaff
Riley Evan Shuster, Carl Reilly, Daan M. Maijer, Steve Cockcroft

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIngotShrinkageConsolidation (business)Process engineeringVoid (composites)Materials scienceMechanical engineeringThermalSump (aquarium)AlloyMetallurgyMechanicsEngineeringComposite materialThermodynamicsWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Control of chemistry and shrinkage void in the final stages of the consolidation processes employed to produce Ti alloy ingots is critical from the standpoint of productivity as there is a direct correlation to the amount of material that must be removed prior to further downstream processing. The application of power to the top surface during this stage allows the raising of the depth of shrinkage voids; however, it can also cause excessive evaporation of volatile elements within the alloy. The balancing of these two factors represents a classic optimization problem. A mathematical model describing the final stage of a commercial consolidation process has been developed to assist in the optimization of the process. The model solves the coupled thermal-fluid flow problem including solute conservation and evaporation. Experimental measurements consisting of the sump depth, pool profile marking, and local composition analysis have been used to validate the model predictions under various casting conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.737
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and EngineeringSame topicMetallurgical Processes and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207