L’héritage institutionnaliste de la science politique au Canada anglais*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article explore la tradition institutionnaliste du Canada anglais et présente un bref historique de sa montée et de son développement à la lumière de documents clés propres à différentes périodes historiques. L’article compare l’évolution de cette tradition au Canada anglais à celle qui s’est manifestée dans le cadre plus large de l’institutionnalisme historique en politique comparée. On y fait valoir que l’institutionnalisme du Canada anglais constitue une riche tradition, particulièrement en ce qui a trait à ses dimensions descriptive et normative. L’institutionnalisme du Canada anglais s’est articulé autour du remaniement de l’État canadien dans le cadre des défis posés par le problème de l’« unité nationale ». À l’heure actuelle, les ouvrages continuent d’être axés sur la dimension descriptive de ce courant, bien que l’institutionnalisme historique en tant que programme intellectuel exerce une influence considérable dans le domaine de l’étude des politiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".