Investigation of regulatory factors required for alternative oxidase production in <i>Neurospora crassa</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alternative oxidase (AOX) has been found in a large number of filamentous fungi and yeasts with the notable exceptions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. In virtually all of these fungi, AOX is induced by stresses on the cell that compromise the efficiency of the standard mitochondrial electron transport chain. As AOX is encoded in the nucleus and the signals that induce its expression originate in mitochondria, induction of the enzyme provides a classic example of retrograde regulation where signals from mitochondria influence the expression of nuclear genes. We have previously isolated mutants in Neurospora crassa that are incapable of inducing AOX. The genes affected in two of these mutants, aod-2 and aod-5, encode zinc cluster transcription factors that act to control expression of the AOX by binding to an alternative oxidase induction motif (AIM) found in the promoter of the AOX structural gene. We have now used pull-down assays and size-exclusion chromatography to demonstrate that the AOD2 and AOD5 proteins physically interact in vitro. In addition, we have shown that a homolog of the RTG2 protein, which is part of a classic retrograde signaling pathway in S. cerevisiae, is not required for AOX regulation in N. crassa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".