La commission Bouchard-Taylor et la perception des rapports entre « Québécois » et « musulmans » au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article aborde des questions théoriques préalables aux recherches sur les perceptions des rapports entre « Québécois » et « musulmans » au Québec à la lumière des événements reliés à la commission Bouchard-Taylor en 2007-2008. Il présente d’abord une balise théorique fondée sur une approche des identités pluriscopes, puis il propose des remarques contextuelles quant à la nature des liens entre laïcité et religion au Québec qui ont influé sur ces perceptions. Pour les travaux ultérieurs, il suggère une hypothèse de travail selon laquelle la diversité de la perception des musulmans au Québec par la majorité non musulmane reproduit un rapport ancien à l’altérité chez les Québécois de souche canadienne-française catholique qui va de la tolérance et de l’ouverture à l’intolérance et à l’exclusion. Ce qu’il reste à déterminer est l’importance relative de ces attitudes les unes par rapport aux autres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".