MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Emigration, Upstream Movement, and Habitat Use by Sterile and Fertile Sea Lampreys in Three Lake Superior Tributaries

2000· article· en· W2046363099 on OpenAlexaff
J. R. M. Kelso, William M. Gardner

Bibliographic record

VenueNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersGreat Lakes Fishery Commission
KeywordsPetromyzonSTREAMSTributaryLampreyHabitatFisheryEnvironmental scienceEcologyCobbleBiologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To investigate upstream spawning migration behavior of fertile and sterilized sea lampreys Petromyzon marinus, we attached radio transmitters to 149 sea lampreys, released them in three tributaries of Lake Superior between 1993 and 1996, and followed their movements for up to 60 d. Emigration from spawning streams was variable between years and streams (10–50% of releases within a stream), appeared to be affected by the length of unimpeded stream, and was not affected by the sterilization procedure. Most sea lampreys that stayed in the streams moved upstream (64%), the majority moving between 2200 and 0300 hours. Total distance traveled, daily movement rates, and habitat selected by sea lampreys did not differ between fertile males and sterile males. In all streams, sea lampreys selected habitat with significantly reduced light levels and made use of habitat providing refugia—brush piles, overhanging banks, and boulders. Differences in emigration rates among streams implies that stocking rates of sterile male sea lampreys may have to be adjusted by stream to achieve expected suppression of larval sea lamprey production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorth American Journal of Fisheries ManagementSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207