An optical-optical double resonance probe of the lowest triplet state of jet-cooled thiophosgene: Rovibronic structures and electronic relaxation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The vibrational structure, rotational structure, and electronic relaxation of the "dark" T1 3A2(n,pi*) state of jet-cooled thiophosgene have been investigated by two-color S2<--T1<--S0 optical-optical double resonance (OODR) spectroscopy, which monitors the S2-->S0 fluorescence generated by S2<--T1 excitation. This method is capable of isolating the T1 vibrational structure into a1, b1, and b2 symmetry blocks. The fluorescence-detected vibrational structure of the Tz spin state of T1 shows that the CS stretching frequency as well as the barrier height for pyramidal deformation are significantly greater in the 3A2(n,pi*) state than in the corresponding 1A2(n,pi*) state. The differing vibrational parameters of the T1 thiophosgene relative to the S1 thiophosgene can be attributed to the motions of unpaired electrons that are better correlated when they are in the excited singlet state than when they are in the triplet state of same electron configuration. A set of T1 structural parameters and the information concerning the T1 spin states have been obtained from least-square fittings of the rotationally resolved T1<--S0 excitation spectrum. The nearly degenerate mid R:x and mid R:y spin states are well removed from mid R:z spin component, indicating that T1 thiophosgene is a good example of case (ab) coupling. The decay of the mid R:z spin state of T1 thiophosgene, obtained from time-resolved S2<--T1<--S0 OODR experiment, is characteristic of strong-coupling intermediate-case decay in which an initial rapid decay is followed by recurrences and/or a long-lived quasiexponential decay.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".