MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046378114 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.67.155210

Acceptor identification using magnetophotoluminescence of bound exciton states in InSb

2003· article· en· W2046378114 on OpenAlexafffund
J. A. H. Stotz, M. L. W. Thewalt

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B, Condensed matter · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsExcited stateAcceptorExcitonBinding energyPhotoluminescenceZeeman effectLuminescenceAtomic physicsPhysicsIndium antimonideBound stateMaterials scienceMagnetic fieldCondensed matter physicsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photoluminescence measurements were performed on Czochralski-grown indium antimonide samples in magnetic fields up to 7 T using a cryogenically cooled interferometer. Principal acceptor bound exciton luminescence and corresponding two-hole transitions (THT) were observed for both p-type and n-type samples. THT corresponding to the ${2S}_{3/2}$ excited states of the acceptor were observed in Cd-doped and Ge-doped InSb samples, and the photoluminescence of the two acceptors can be distinctly resolved with a separation of $1.6{\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ at 1 T. For magnetic fields above 1 T, excitations to the ${2P}_{5/2}$ and ${3S}_{3/2}$ states were also observed. The Zeeman splittings for all of the THT were mapped as a function of magnetic field, and zero-field energies for the acceptor excited states ${2S}_{3/2}({\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{8}),$ ${3S}_{3/2}({\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{8}),$ ${2P}_{5/2}({\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{8}),$ and ${2P}_{5/2}({\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{7})$ were measured for both the Ge and Cd acceptors. Using the energy separation of the principal bound exciton luminescence and the THT luminescence from the ${2P}_{5/2}({\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{7})$ excited state along with the theoretically calculated binding energy for the ${2P}_{5/2}({\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{7})$ state, acceptor binding energies of 79.2 and $80.5{\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ were established for Ge and Cd, respectively. The THT for the ${2S}_{3/2}({\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{8})$ excited state of a third, unidentified acceptor ${(A}_{3})$ were observed, and a binding energy of $106.9{\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ was determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B, Condensed matterSame topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207