Phylogeny of<i>Sisymbrium</i>(Brassicaceae) based on ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The genus Sisymbrium as currently circumscribed includes about 94 species disjunctly distributed in the Old (41 spp.) and the New World (53 spp.). Sisymbrium has been variously delimited, with several segregate genera proposed (subtribe Sisymbriinae) primarily for the new World taxa, including Schoenocrambe, Coelophragmus, and Mostacillastrum. Using sequence data from the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA and the 5.8S rRNA gene (collectively, ITS region), we examined the evolutionary relationships of Old and New World Sisymbrium species with its segregate genera and the validity of O.E. Schulz's classical sectional treatment of Sisymbrium. Sequence data were obtained from 33 Sisymbrium species, representing all 14 sections and two Sisymbrium species formerly assigned to segregate genera Coelophragmus and Mostacillastrum (subtribe Sisymbriinae), and two putative Sisymbrium species currently assigned to Neotorularia. Sequence data were also obtained from 26 taxa from segregate or related genera includingSchoenocrambe, Werdermannia (subtribe Sisymbriinae), eight genera in the Thelypodieae, Sibara (tribe Arabideae) and Pringlea (tribe Pringleeae), four members of the tribe Brassiceae, and three other Neotorularia species. Results from maximum parsimony analysis showed a polyphyletic origin for Sisymbrium and did not correspond well to Schulz's sectional classification. Sisymbrium species were split into three major clades: Old World Sisymbrium (including Neotorularia aculeolata, Neotorularia afghanica, and the type species of Schoenocrambe, Schoenocrambe linifolia, the sole New World member of this Old World clade); New World Sisymbrium (along with the remaining New World taxa) and designated as the New World Thelypodieae alliance; and the tribe Brassiceae ( including Sisymbrium supinum and Sisymbrium thellungii).Key words: Sisymbrium, Schoenocrambe, ITS, Thelypodieae, taxonomy, Brassicaceae.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".