MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046409238 · doi:10.1139/p10-030

Local symmetry and Z-scan analysis of ZnSe/Eu<sup>3+</sup> doped sol–gel silica hosts

2010· article· en· W2046409238 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Siby Mathew, Kaushal Kumar, C. Sudarsanakumar, V. P. N. Nampoori, N.V. Unnikrishnan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNonlinear Optical Materials Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity Grants Commission
KeywordsIonEuropiumDopingPhysicsAbsorption (acoustics)ExcitationAtomic physicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Absorption spectroscopyElectronMolecular physicsOpticsCondensed matter physicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vibrational state side-band spectral analysis of silica matrices, doped with ZnSe/Eu3+ ions, associated with the excitation transition 7F0→5D2 is used to analyze the local asymmetry of the rare earth ions in the glass host. The large inhomogeneous linewidth for the ZnSe co-doped samples indicates the wide distribution of the Eu3+ ions in the matrix and is related to the flexibility of the local glass network. The fluorescence spectra reveal that the intensity of the characteristic emission of europium increases considerably in the presence of ZnSe particles. This phenomenon can be explained by the energy transfer resulting from electron–hole recombination in the ZnSe to the rare earth ion. Nonlinear optical absorption of the sample is also investigated at a wavelength of 532 nm, using open aperture Z-scan technique. The sample exhibits reversible saturable absorption (RSA), which is found to depend on excitation fluence. RSA is due to the enhanced absorption resulting from the electron dynamics in nano-crystallites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicNonlinear Optical Materials StudiesFrench-language works237,207