MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046424730 · doi:10.1109/icdsp.2014.6900735

One dimensional multi-resolution Local Binary Patterns features (1DMRLBP) for regular electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform detection

2014· article· en· W2046424730 on OpenAlexaff
Wael Louis, Dimitrios Hatzinakos, A. Venetsanopoulos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveformHistogramComputer scienceMetric (unit)Feature extractionSIGNAL (programming language)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceFeature (linguistics)Binary numberBiometricsLocal binary patternsComputer visionImage (mathematics)MathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Feeding a noisy signal to a biometric system degrades its performance. Hence, signal quality measure is used to avoid passing irregular signals to subsequent systems such as bio-metric systems. To tackle this issue, 1DMRLBP features, which are 1 dimensional signal feature extraction (inspired by the 2 dimensional image Local Binary Patterns) is proposed. 1DMRLBP with its multi-resolution capability captures local and global signal characteristics; and with its histogram extraction avoids segments misalignment and reduces the number of features. Also with some modifications, 1DMRLBP accommodates the problem of unknown amplitude of a signal. 1DMRLBP achieves 91% performance rate in distinguishing between regular and irregular ECG waveforms. MATLAB code and more information are available at www.comm.utoronto.ca/~wlouis/1DMRLBP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207