MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046447657 · doi:10.1115/sbc2008-192558

Design of Experiments for Exposure of Astrocytes to Elevated Hydrostatic Pressure and Hypoxia

2008· article· en· W2046447657 on OpenAlexafffund
Shadi Rajabi, Craig A. Simmons, C. Ross Ethier

Bibliographic record

VenueASME 2008 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Parts A and B · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGlaucomaOptic nerveIntraocular pressureOphthalmologyMedicineVisual fieldOptic neuropathyHypoxia (environmental)BlindnessHydrostatic pressureOptometryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glaucoma, a chronic optic neuropathy, is the second most common cause of blindness, affecting 67 million people worldwide. The damage in glaucoma occurs at the optic nerve head (ONH), where the axons of the retinal ganglion cells leave the eye posteriorly. Glaucoma is frequently associated with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), and visual field loss can be prevented by significant lowering of IOP. Hence, the role of pressure in glaucoma is important. Unfortunately, the mechanism by which pressure leads to vision loss in glaucoma is very poorly understood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASME 2008 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Parts A and BSame topicGlaucoma and retinal disordersFrench-language works237,207