MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046451053 · doi:10.1080/09593330309385547

Process control and design considerations for methanol‐induced denitrification in a sequencing batch reactor

2003· article· en· W2046451053 on OpenAlexaff
Nuno R Louzeiro, D. S. Mavinic, W. K. Oldham, Axel Meisen, Ian S Gardner

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Technology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaStantec (Canada)University of British ColumbiaBritish Columbia Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDenitrificationSequencing batch reactorMethanolChemistryAnoxic watersBatch reactorPulp and paper industryWastewaterEnvironmental engineeringWaste managementEnvironmental chemistryNitrogenEnvironmental scienceCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary goal of this research was to determine the effect of methanol-induced denitrification on volatile suspended solids production, settleability, and oxidation-reduction potential in a full-scale sequencing batch reactor. Batch tests were also conducted to determine the influence of mixing and acclimatization on the denitrification of wastewater with methanol. The observed sludge production in the full-scale sequencing batch reactor with methanol addition was 0.21 kg volatile suspended solids l(-1) methanol, versus the calculated stoichiometric sludge production of 0.17 kg volatile suspended solids l(-1) methanol. The settleability in the full-scale sequencing batch reactor, measured by the sludge volume index, increases linearly with increasing denitrification rate. The total change in the oxidation-reduction potential magnitude during a sequencing batch reactor cycle increased linearly with increasing denitrification rate. A minimum of 55% increase in the denitrification rate was observed in a batch reactor with methanol addition and a sludge acclimatized to methanol addition, compared to a batch reactor with methanol addition and a non-acclimatized sludge. The non-acclimatized batch reactor had a negligible denitrification rate without methanol addition. However, significant denitrification rates were observed in the acclimatized batch reactors without methanol addition, potentially caused by microbial storage or an increased population of denitrifiers that scavenge any available carbon. A completely mixed batch reactor, with sludge acclimatized to methanol addition during the anoxic cycle, had an increase in the denitrification rate ranging from 660%, without methanol addition, to 200%, with a methanol dosage of 12.7 mg l(-1), compared to the unmixed batch reactor with an acclimatized sludge. Therefore, mixing appears to be critical to the denitrification process, to realize the best kinetic performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental TechnologySame topicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen RemovalFrench-language works237,207