MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046507158 · doi:10.1089/end.2006.20.1068

BCG for Upper-Tract Transitional-Cell Carcinoma: Is It Safe in Patients with Renal Compromise?

2006· article· en· W2046507158 on OpenAlexaff
Saleh Binsaleh, Kanishka Sircar, Mostafa Elhilali, Maurice Anidjar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Endourology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsMontreal General HospitalMcGill UniversityRoyal Victoria Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTransitional cell carcinomaUpper urinary tractHemodialysisUrologyUrinary systemRenal functionCarcinomaSurgeryKidneyRenal cell carcinomaInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report three cases of end-stage renal failure necessitating hemodialysis subsequent to BCG administration for the treatment of upper-urinary tract transitional-cell carcinoma in patients with a solitary kidney, one with normal renal function and two with chronic renal failure prior to BCG instillation. We discuss treatment-related issues with pertinent literature review.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of EndourologySame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207