Fibrillation potential onset in peripheral nerve injury
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Fibrillation potentials are an accepted electrical marker of muscle denervation that occur in axonal nerve injury. Clinically, they are used to determine the type of, and prognosis for nerve injuries. The time of occurrence after nerve injury plays a critical role in clinical decision making. This study explores the evolution of the generally accepted guideline that fibrillation potentials occur 1 to 4 weeks after axonal nerve injury. METHODS: Pubmed, Ovid, and EMBASE, and current textbooks were reviewed. References were recursively followed back to the initial description of fibrillation potentials. RESULTS: The majority of our understanding regarding the timing of onset of fibrillation potentials appears to arise from animal experiments in the mid-20th century. CONCLUSIONS: Despite frequent use in human clinical care, published evidence for the 1 to 4 week guideline comes almost entirely from animal studies. An appreciation of this background and resulting limitations aids clinical application of this guideline.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it